<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cmswatch.com" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>CMS Watch Broadvision Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.cmswatch.com</link>
      <description>CMS Watch headlines about Broadvision</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:36:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <dc:creator>editor@cmswatch.com (Tony Byrne)</dc:creator>
      <dc:rights>Copyright 2005, CMS Watch</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>CMS Watch</dc:publisher>
      
      <item>
         <title>Location matters: URLs should be short, meaningful and permanent</title>
         <description>In a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.jonudell.net/2008/01/17/aspx-considered-harmful/&quot;&gt;refreshing blog entry&lt;/a&gt; from last week, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Portal/Vendors/Microsoft&quot;&gt;Microsoft&lt;/a&gt; evangelist Jon Udell considered .aspx harmful. Udell boils it down to futureproofing and style.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We've been writing about the importance of URL's since 2003 (e.g. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/210-CMS-Lessons-from-Primary-School&quot;&gt;CMS 
  Lessons from Primary School&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/120-Case-Against-Portals&quot;&gt;Portal 
  Software: Passing Fad or Real Value?&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/160-Portal-Must-Haves&quot;&gt;State 
  of the Art for Enterprise Portals&lt;/a&gt;) and in &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Report/&quot;&gt;The 
  Web CMS Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Portal/Report/&quot;&gt;The 
  Enterprise Portals Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; we cover the URL structure for each and every 
  vendor. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interestingly almost every vendor criticizes what we write about them when 
  it comes to URL conventions, with a few open source vendors as the exception. 
  Either the vendors with harmful URLs assert that it is a non-issue or they keep 
  repeating that their professional services team can &lt;i&gt;easily implement&lt;/i&gt; 
  redirects or rewrites or other hacks to create shorter, better URLs. Rarely 
  do they remember that if you do create redirects those too also need to managed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With lack of understanding from the vendors, many enterprises find themselves 
  tied to both vendors and technology. An unfortunate example is Italian car manufacturer 
  FIAT, which uses &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Portal/Vendors/BroadVision&quot;&gt;BroadVision&lt;/a&gt; 
  on their website with a URL that looks like this:&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;code&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fiat.com/cgi-bin/pbrand.dll/FIAT_COM/home.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=no&quot;&gt;http://www.fiat.com/cgi-bin/pbrand.dll/FIAT_COM/home.jsp?BV_UseBVCookie=no&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
  The URL is fascinating reading: You'll find the BroadVision cookie flag at the 
  end, after JSP technology mixed with a DLL and CGI (!) earlier on. I've seen 
  longer URLs, but the problem here is certainly both futureproofing and style, 
  as Udell points out. I would add security to the list of problems, since a transparently programmatic URL is easier to hack.&lt;/p&gt; 

&lt;p&gt;Not only should you ensure that your site has short, meaningful and permanent 
  URLs, but as buyers you should also try to influence the vendors so that they 
  understand the issue. This matter is relevant to every single project, so &lt;em&gt;customization&lt;/em&gt; 
  should not be required. This should be out-of-the-box!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Further reading: Take a look at a 10-year old article from Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI&quot;&gt;Cool URIs don't change&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1127-Location-matters:-URLs-should-be-short,-meaningful-and-permanent?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Enterprise Portals</category>
         <author>info@jboye.dk(Janus Boye)</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:25:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Enterprise Portal Marketplace: 2008 Vendor Risk Profile</title>
         <description>It is all too easy to identify vendors for your shortlist based on their supposed &amp;quot;leadership&amp;quot; status in the market.  But CMS Watch contributing analyst Janus Boye argues that CIOs, procurement officers, and other technology leaders considering investments in enterprise portals should carefully examine the risk profile of prospective vendors to help identify the right &amp;quot;fit&amp;quot; for their needs.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/173-Portals-2008?source=RSS</link>
         <category></category>
         <author>jb@boyeit.dk(Janus Boye)</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BroadVision: Missing in action?</title>
         <description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.broadvision.com&quot;&gt;website&lt;/a&gt; of onetime Portal and CMS vendor Broadvision has been unavailable for the last several days. Strange from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Portal/Vendors/Broadvision&quot;&gt;BroadVision&lt;/a&gt;, which earlier this month announced their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=83085694-7F0B-4F25-99CA-8A95B49B933F&quot;&gt;2007 roadmap&lt;/a&gt;. Website maintenance is sometimes necessary, but to take a website down for 3+ days seems peculiar. A few partners even report that mails are bouncing. This may not be the bust of the company, but buyers should ask themselves whether a firm that talks about &quot;e-business for everyone&quot; really understands the Web when their site is down for so long. BroadVision has been through a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/606-BroadVision-carries-on-as-a-public-company...for-now&quot;&gt;tough time&lt;/a&gt; in the last years and while we've all experienced troubles with our own websites, the obvious question remains: What's really going on at BroadVision? [Update, March 30: The website is back up and in an e-mail BroadVision cites &quot;an Internet Outage&quot; as cause of the problem]</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/872-BroadVision:-Missing-in-action?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Enterprise Portals</category>
         <author>info@jboye.dk(Janus Boye)</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:43:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Portal Kudos and Shortcomings -- Summer, 2006</title>
         <description>Segmenting the portal software marketplace by putting products into boxes on charts is a popular exercise among pundits. But CMS Watch contributing analyst Janus Boye argues that for buyers, a meaningful vendor breakdown must describe how well the various offerings fit actual requirements across specific business scenarios.  See how Janus compares the major portal products in the marketplace today...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/147-Portal-Marketplace?source=RSS</link>
         <category></category>
         <author>jb@boyeit.dk(Janus Boye)</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:24:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BroadVision carries on as a public company...for now</title>
         <description>In July 2005 ailing portal vendor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Portal/Vendors/Broadvision&quot;&gt;BroadVision&lt;/a&gt; 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/484-BroadVision-Goes-Private&quot;&gt;announced 
  their plans to go private&lt;/a&gt; and be acquired by a private equity company. It 
  slipped our radar that in November the company then announced a &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ileaf.com/bvsn/bvcom/ep/contentView.do?pageTypeId=8920&amp;contentTypeId=1048&amp;programId=8906&amp;contentId=13001&amp;BV_EngineID=ccceaddfmdmkkdjcefecefedghhdfjl.0&quot;&gt;mutual 
  termination of acquisition&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;, due to &amp;quot;difficulty of securing a 
  quorum in the stockholder vote.&amp;quot; Pehong Chen, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/1999/99_39/b3648040.htm&quot;&gt;onetime media darling&lt;/a&gt; and still BroadVision's Chairman and 
  CEO, has gamely made a commitment to relieve the company of some short-term 
  liquidity concerns by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ileaf.com/bvsn/bvcom/ep/contentView.do?contentType=ISD_GENERAL_CONTENT&amp;programId=8308&amp;programPage=%2Fjsp%2Fwww%2Fbrowse%2Fprogram_general.jsp&amp;contentId=13061&amp;pageTypeId=8151&amp;channelId=-8261&amp;BV_EngineID=ccceaddfmdmkkdjcefecefedghhdfjl.0&quot;&gt;fronting 
  some of his own cash&lt;/a&gt;. In later news from December, BroadVision announced 
  plans for a possible reverse stock split to maintain its NASDAQ listing. The 
  company continues to work hard to survive -- and potentially find a new owner. 
  BroadVision has made a serious investment to migrate off its own application 
  server to broader J2EE-platform support, and relative to its smallish size, the 
  company certainly tries to address some ambitious portal problems. Read more 
  in the upcoming &lt;em&gt;Enterprise Portals Report&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/606-BroadVision-carries-on-as-a-public-company...for-now?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Enterprise Portals</category>
         <author>info@jboye.dk(Janus Boye)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:26:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>BroadVision Goes Private</title>
         <description>Running short of cash and struggling under a debt load, BroadVision has &lt;a href=&quot;http://biz.yahoo.com/bizj/050726/1140009.html?.v=1&quot;&gt;agreed 
  to be purchased by a private equity firm&lt;/a&gt;. Most analysts already considered 
  BroadVision on life support, although founder Pehong Chen kept the firm chugging 
  while casting about for potential suitors. I think it's indicative of what can 
  happen to diversified (BroadVision has focused variously on CMS, CRM, and Portals) 
  software firms that run out of, well, runway. Software companies can often survive 
  on maintenance streams, but Broadvision's maintenance income dropped ominously 
  from 2004 to 2005. BroadVision's new owners will presumably shed costs and modules 
  to make the company more focused and acquirable. I disagree that &lt;a href=&quot;http://reservoirpartners.typepad.com/reservoir_partners_enterp/2005/07/how_to_create_4.html&quot;&gt;this is the 
  forerunner of consolidation&lt;/a&gt; to come, at least in the CMS/Portal space near-term. 
  Smaller ECM vendors like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Interwoven&quot;&gt;Interwoven&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Vignette&quot;&gt;Vignette&lt;/a&gt; may have weak earnings, but 
  they still sport strong balance sheets, and therefore have less urgency than 
  BroadVision to find an exit.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/484-BroadVision-Goes-Private?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Enterprise Portals</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>

   </channel>
</rss>

