<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cmswatch.com" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>CMS Watch Coveo Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.cmswatch.com</link>
      <description>CMS Watch headlines about Coveo</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue,  7 Oct 2008 06:31:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <dc:creator>editor@cmswatch.com (Tony Byrne)</dc:creator>
      <dc:rights>Copyright 2005, CMS Watch</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>CMS Watch</dc:publisher>
      
      <item>
         <title>Enterprise Search Vendor Landscape, Circa 2008</title>
         <description>You might be tempted to select enterprise search vendors for your shortlist based on their supposed 
  &amp;quot;leadership&amp;quot; status in the market -- status either conferred by analyst 
  firms or assumed by the vendors themselves. However, CMS Watch analyst Theresa Regli argues that you need to look more closely at product and vendor alike -- and understand where both are headed -- to properly evaluate your longterm risks and opportunities in an evolving marketplace...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/175-Search-2008?source=RSS</link>
         <category></category>
         <author>tregli@cmswatch.com(Theresa Regli and Adriaan Bloem)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:16:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Twelve Predictions for 2008</title>
         <description>It's that time of year again. The CMS Watch analyst team ponders what to expect    next year, and offers 12 predictions that we think will shape content technologies  in 2008 -- from Google to Microsoft, Web/Enterprise 2.0, Enterprise Search, Archiving, and more...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/172-2008-Predictions?source=RSS</link>
         <category></category>
         <author>editor@cmswatch.com(The CMS Watch Analyst Team)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:01:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Enterprise Search: Trends for 2008</title>
         <description>What's new in enterprise search?  Very much and very little, argues CMS Watch Contributing Analyst Adriaan Bloem.  Based on just-completed market research, Adriaan concludes that enterprise search customers and vendors alike are still grappling with key usability and technical challenges.  But 2007 saw substantial marketplace ferment, and 2008 is likely to bring more...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/170-Search-Trends?source=RSS</link>
         <category></category>
         <author>bloem@radagio.com(Adriaan Bloem)</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:05:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Mondosoft's ride coming to an end?</title>
         <description>According to the Danish financial newspaper &lt;em&gt;B&amp;oslash;rsen&lt;/em&gt;, enterprise 
  search vendor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Mondosoft&quot;&gt;Mondosoft&lt;/a&gt; 
  is now in liquidation (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.version2.dk/artikel/4440&quot;&gt;Version2&lt;/a&gt;). 
  Their best-known product is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/CMS/Vendors/Microsoft&quot;&gt;SharePoint&lt;/a&gt; 
  add-on called &amp;quot;Ontolica,&amp;quot; whose &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ontolica.com/Download/Request%20Product.aspx?prod=onwi&amp;buy=0&quot;&gt;free 
  version&lt;/a&gt; provides MOSS with the ability to perform wildcard searches.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hitching a ride with Microsoft may be profitable, but Redmond giveth and Redmond 
  taketh: with the improved capabilities in SharePoint 2007 the advantages of 
  a third-party search engine are less obvious than before. Others have been more 
  prescient (Coveo &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coveo.com/en/News/PressReleases.aspx?id=2007-08-21_en&quot;&gt;dissolved 
  their SharePoint-specific offering&lt;/a&gt; into their enterprise search product 
  last August), but the success of MOSS2007 and scramble of major vendors to announce 
  their &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/976-FAST,-Microsoft-and-the-meaning-of-working-together&quot;&gt;SharePoint 
  strategy&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; may have clouded Mondosoft's vision. Mondosoft's investors, 
  however, seem to have been less-than-impressed with the returns, leaving the 
  technology up for grabs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is talk of private equity firm &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jmiinvest.dk/index_eng.html&quot;&gt;JMI 
  Invest&lt;/a&gt; acquiring Mondosoft's assets for a sum &amp;quot;in the three-digit millions&amp;quot; 
  of kroner, roughly tens of millions in USD. In an interesting twist, that would 
  put Mondosoft in the company of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itfactory.com/&quot;&gt;IT FACTORY&lt;/a&gt;, 
  a Danish company specializing in IBM-based SaaS solutions. If this were to materialize, 
  Ontolica might end up making the switch from the Microsoft ecosphere to the 
  IBM Websphere. In the meantime, Mondosoft customers should probably &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Report/&quot;&gt;consider 
  their alternatives&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And of course a broader lesson: Mondosoft technology was well regarded, but 
  search is a tough business.  Unlike other bouyant technology sectors, 
  sometimes small search vendors do fold (witness the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/753-Some-small-search-vendors-really-do-fade-away&quot;&gt;disappearance&lt;/a&gt; 
  of Danish compatriot Speed of Mind, or Israeli search vendor Entopia).</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1038-Mondosoft's-ride-coming-to-an-end?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Enterprise Search</category>
         <author>bloem@radagio.com(Adriaan Bloem)</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:25:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Microsoft and search: the year of the dog?</title>
         <description>Search engine vendors &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Coveo&quot;&gt;Coveo&lt;/a&gt;, 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/dtSearch&quot;&gt;dtSearch&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Endeca&quot;&gt;Endeca&lt;/a&gt;, 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Fast%20Search%20&amp;%20Transfer&quot;&gt;Fast 
  Search &amp; Transfer&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Google&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;, 
  and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Mondosoft&quot;&gt;Mondosoft&lt;/a&gt;, 
  among others just did a little dance for joy. Why? As you've doubtless heard, 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8GG8SFG0.htm?campaign_id=apn_home_down&amp;chan=db&quot;&gt;Microsoft 
  has delayed&lt;/a&gt; the release of Vista, as well as its next-generation Office 
  suite and much-needed server-side rebuilds. Microsoft today has no single enterprise 
  search system that can perform what customers with SharePoint, Exchange, and 
  other Microsoft bits and pieces want to do: find disparate emails and documents. 
  Microsoft is, in effect, leaving the 2006 enterprise search market to other 
  systems that can work in the crazy-quilt frameworks of Microsoft products. Had 
  Redmond hit its 2006 ship dates, it might have had a chance to slow the recent 
  surge of third-party search systems. Both Fast Search and Google should be able 
  to step in to help Microsoft-dependent organizations solve their &quot;findability&quot; 
  problems. Smaller vendors like Coveo, dtSearch, Endeca, and Mondosoft reported 
  strong gains in 2005. Microsoft's inability to get its basic product out the 
  door could fuel these companies' growth. Indeed, they could not have asked for 
  a better Chinese New Year's present. For Microsoft, 2006 is the year of the 
  dog.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/651-Microsoft-and-search:-the-year-of-the-dog?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Enterprise Search</category>
         <author>search-analyst@cmswatch.com(Stephen Arnold)</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:38:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>3rd-Party Search for SharePoint</title>
         <description>Enterprise Search vendor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Coveo&quot;&gt;Coveo&lt;/a&gt; has launched a &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coveo.com/en/sharepoint-search/product-info.html&quot;&gt;Sharepoint&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; edition of 
its search product. Why create a commercial search engine specifically for SharePoint 
when the Microsoft portal comes with its own &amp;quot;Search Services&amp;quot; for free? 
As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Report/&quot;&gt;Enterprise Search Report&lt;/a&gt; readers know, SharePoint Search is relatively simple 
to configure, but somewhat complex to customize in depth; out of the box it is 
quite functional but not exactly feature rich. Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coveo.com/en/sharepoint-search/images/ss1.png&quot;&gt;this screenshot&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coveo.com/en/sharepoint-search/images/ss4.png&quot;&gt;this 
one&lt;/a&gt; from Coveo to get a sense for their value-add. At some point, Microsoft will 
surely add advanced search features to SharePoint, but in the meantime, you might want to try out Coveo's free trial.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/456-3rd-Party-Search-for-SharePoint?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Enterprise Search</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:01:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Verity Acquires 80-20 Software</title>
         <description>&amp;quot;Big 4&amp;quot; enterprise search vendor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Verity&quot;&gt;Verity&lt;/a&gt; has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verity.com/company/press/releases/release.jsp?pressID=1056&quot;&gt;acquired desktop search vendor 80-20&lt;/a&gt;.  The growth of desktop search is compelling major vendors to provide solutions that span from desktop to enterprise indexes.  Will independent desktop search vendors &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/ISYS&quot;&gt;ISYS&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.copernic.com/&quot;&gt;Copernic&lt;/a&gt; be swallowed next?  The latter has conveniently spun off its server-based search tools as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Coveo&quot;&gt;a separate company&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/454-Verity-Acquires-80-20-Software?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Enterprise Search</category>
         <author>tbyrne@cmswatch.com(Tony Byrne)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:35:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>

   </channel>
</rss>

