<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cmswatch.com" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>CMS Watch FormTek Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.cmswatch.com</link>
      <description>CMS Watch headlines about FormTek</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue,  7 Oct 2008 06:29:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <dc:creator>editor@cmswatch.com (Tony Byrne)</dc:creator>
      <dc:rights>Copyright 2005, CMS Watch</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>CMS Watch</dc:publisher>
      
      <item>
         <title>The ECM Suites Report 2009 released today</title>
         <description>Today I'm proud to announce the release of the 2009 edition of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/ECM/Report&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;The ECM
Suites Report&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Expanded out to over 400 pages, I believe this constitutes
the most comprehensive ECM product evaluation report of its kind. In this
edition we have added some new vendors, dropped some old, and revised
all 30 product reviews.&lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
This churn reflects a vibrant and
extremely healthy global ECM market.  As we note in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/About/Press/200809ECM/&quot;&gt;today's press
release&lt;/a&gt;, there probably has never been a better time for
buyers, with a wide range of strong products to chose from, especially in the mid market.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If
there is one thing in particular this latest research has shown us, it is that
SharePoint did not (as many predicted) kill the ECM market, but rather the
ECM market has embraced SharePoint -- and we are all the better  for it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course there are some stinkers out there, and as buyer you
need to exercise caution, but we hope the advice, critiques, and &amp;quot;insider&amp;quot; detail
we provide in this report will help mitigate your risks. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As always, if you're a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Reports/Subscriptions/&quot;&gt;subscription customer&lt;/a&gt;, you'll automatically receive your copy shortly.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1367-The-ECM-Suites-Report-2009-released-today?source=RSS</link>
         <category>ECM Suites</category>
         <author>aps@cmswatch.com(Alan Pelz-Sharpe)</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:07:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Considering smaller ECM vendors</title>
         <description>Currently on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intelligententerprise.com&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Intelligent 
  Enterprise&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; you can read my recent review of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intelligententerprise.com/print_article.jhtml?articleID=198100018&quot;&gt;Xythos 
  Document Manager Version 6&lt;/a&gt;. Though I have a short fuse with those who say 
  that &amp;quot;basic content services&amp;quot; (BCS) are all that any enterprise needs 
  for their ECM requirements, I remain nonetheless supportive of &amp;quot;lite&amp;quot; 
  offerings. ECM is such an overblown and overused term (&lt;em&gt;but it's the only 
  one we have&lt;/em&gt;) that encompasses everything from huge imaging and case management 
  deployments to simple document collaboration projects. There is room for all 
  the vendors who want to deliver value; the problem comes for the buyer to make 
  sense of apparently similar, but actually widely divergent ECM products in this 
  confused market. Many niche vendors such as as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/ECM/Vendors/Xythos&quot;&gt;Xythos&lt;/a&gt;, 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/ECM/Vendors/Saperion&quot;&gt;Saperion&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/ECM/Vendors/FormTek&quot;&gt;FormTek&lt;/a&gt; 
  or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/ECM/Vendors/Cimage&quot;&gt;Cimage&lt;/a&gt; can tend 
  to be overlooked as a result, and that's a shame, because under the right circumstances 
  they may offer a better fit for your needs than the likes of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/ECM/Vendors/IBM&quot;&gt;IBM&lt;/a&gt;, 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/ECM/Vendors/Interwoven&quot;&gt;Interwoven&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/ECM/Vendors/OpenText&quot;&gt;Open 
  Text&lt;/a&gt;...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/870-Considering-smaller-ECM-vendors?source=RSS</link>
         <category>ECM Suites</category>
         <author>aps@cmswatch.com(Alan Pelz-Sharpe)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
      </item>

   </channel>
</rss>

