<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.cmswatch.com" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>CMS Watch dtSearch Feed</title>
      <link>http://www.cmswatch.com</link>
      <description>CMS Watch headlines about dtSearch</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon,  8 Sep 2008 06:43:46 -0400</lastBuildDate>
      <dc:creator>editor@cmswatch.com (Tony Byrne)</dc:creator>
      <dc:rights>Copyright 2005, CMS Watch</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>CMS Watch</dc:publisher>
      
      <item>
         <title>Enterprise Search Vendor Landscape, Circa 2008</title>
         <description>You might be tempted to select enterprise search vendors for your shortlist based on their supposed 
  &amp;quot;leadership&amp;quot; status in the market -- status either conferred by analyst 
  firms or assumed by the vendors themselves. However, CMS Watch analyst Theresa Regli argues that you need to look more closely at product and vendor alike -- and understand where both are headed -- to properly evaluate your longterm risks and opportunities in an evolving marketplace...</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Feature/175-Search-2008?source=RSS</link>
         <category></category>
         <author>tregli@cmswatch.com(Theresa Regli and Adriaan Bloem)</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:16:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Microsoft and search: the year of the dog?</title>
         <description>Search engine vendors &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Coveo&quot;&gt;Coveo&lt;/a&gt;, 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/dtSearch&quot;&gt;dtSearch&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Endeca&quot;&gt;Endeca&lt;/a&gt;, 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Fast%20Search%20&amp;%20Transfer&quot;&gt;Fast 
  Search &amp; Transfer&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Google&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;, 
  and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cmswatch.com/Search/Vendors/Mondosoft&quot;&gt;Mondosoft&lt;/a&gt;, 
  among others just did a little dance for joy. Why? As you've doubtless heard, 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8GG8SFG0.htm?campaign_id=apn_home_down&amp;chan=db&quot;&gt;Microsoft 
  has delayed&lt;/a&gt; the release of Vista, as well as its next-generation Office 
  suite and much-needed server-side rebuilds. Microsoft today has no single enterprise 
  search system that can perform what customers with SharePoint, Exchange, and 
  other Microsoft bits and pieces want to do: find disparate emails and documents. 
  Microsoft is, in effect, leaving the 2006 enterprise search market to other 
  systems that can work in the crazy-quilt frameworks of Microsoft products. Had 
  Redmond hit its 2006 ship dates, it might have had a chance to slow the recent 
  surge of third-party search systems. Both Fast Search and Google should be able 
  to step in to help Microsoft-dependent organizations solve their &quot;findability&quot; 
  problems. Smaller vendors like Coveo, dtSearch, Endeca, and Mondosoft reported 
  strong gains in 2005. Microsoft's inability to get its basic product out the 
  door could fuel these companies' growth. Indeed, they could not have asked for 
  a better Chinese New Year's present. For Microsoft, 2006 is the year of the 
  dog.</description>
         <link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/651-Microsoft-and-search:-the-year-of-the-dog?source=RSS</link>
         <category>Enterprise Search</category>
         <author>search-analyst@cmswatch.com(Stephen Arnold)</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:38:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>

   </channel>
</rss>

