Get the real story via our monthly newsletter

Search

    2
    0

rss

Send to a colleague

Home > Commentary > Trends Archive > Vendor Q1 results: boring is good

Browse TrendWatch Blog

Recent Blog Entries

The Complete Archive

Trends by Vendor


TrendWatch by Channel

Web Content Management Trends

Enterprise Portals Trends

ECM Trends

Web Analytics Trends

Enterprise Search Trends

SharePoint Trends

Digital & Media Asset Management Trends

XML & Component Content Management Trends

E-mail Archiving & Management Trends


Report Excerpt

The Enterprise Search Report 2008 looks at... Storage Considerations

"Nevertheless, storage is a key consideration. The number of documents and the average size of the documents increase each year. Electronic mail can pose special challenges because a mail message can include an attachment that may be several megabytes in size. An example is a short message containing a PowerPoint deck or an Adobe Portable Document Format of a 16 page four-color brochure. A good rule of thumb is to plan to increase storage capacity for a search system by 50 percent each year. The search architecture should accommodate plug-and-play storage devices. Mirroring, RAID technology, and clusters are storage approaches that a search system requires. Loss of an index means that a new index must be built from ground zero if a current back up or fail-over mirror is not available."

(p. 84)

More about The Enterprise Search Report 2008

 

TrendWatch Blog

Vendor Q1 results: boring is good

10-May-2006

Several major content management vendors recently released their Q1 financials, and the results suggest more of the same: modest revenue growth and slim-to-decent profitability. Interwoven and Vignette grew their revenues a bit and more or less broke even on earnings. Open Text's revenues dipped slightly, but their bottom line improved after beginning to address their wicked acquisition hang-over. Hummingbird increased revenues and earnings after the RedDot acquisition. FileNet's earnings dipped slightly amid some top-line growth. And so on. Analysts like to talk about epic shifts in the marketplace, but the reality is that -- 3 years after Forbes declared a slew of these players "undead" -- all the major vendors continue to chug along, even in the face of potential future encroachment by Oracle and Microsoft. In fact, for you the technology buyer, marketplace stasis is a good thing; it keeps your suppliers solvent and product roadmaps more predictable. Let analysts wax on about future disruptions and mergers -- your CM vendor is probably doing just fine, at least financially...

- Submitted by: Tony Byrne, Analyst

All Search Channel Trends

Join the conversation

Digg This! Search Technorati Tag it on Del.icio.us



Get a Free Sample

Wondering about CMS Watch research? Sign up to receive free samples of any of our products.




What we do

CMS Watch™ evaluates content-oriented technologies, publishing head-to-head comparative reviews of leading solutions. What makes us special?

  • Our critical analysis exposes product weaknesses as well as strengths
  • We deliver unrivaled technical depth and comprehensive project advice
  • Our research is led by international topic experts
  • We only work for buyers -- never for vendors

Contact us

CMS Watch

info@cmswatch.com

18113 Town Center Drive, Ste 217

Olney, MD USA 20832

1 800 325 6190 (customer service)

+1 617 763 5336 (int'l customer service)

Fax: +1 214 242 3048